On The Road with Vicky Lamburn

In the last ten years since I joined eBay, I have grown steadily annoyed over their practices.

This one stung me big time. They took 15% clear profit. On, what, a large expensive item? No. A £100 laptop. Read the rest of this entry »

Today is a sad day in the world of British literature, one of its giants passed away in the morning of April 19th 2009. JG Ballard was one of Britain’s most influential writers of the twentieth, indeed the twenty-first century. Many an author owes a debt of gratitude to a man who plumbed into topics that no one had dared write before.

My first encounter with JG Ballard’s work was not through his books, indeed some of his most seminal work had been written at least a decade before I was born. Instead it was through the film, Empire of the Sun – directed by Steven Spielberg. I don’t remember the year I first saw it but it was in the early ‘90s on one of those rare occasions where I was allowed to stay up. That film stuck with me for years to come, its haunting narrative of a time and experience I could not possibly understand.

In 1999 I found out the film had been based on a book, Empire of the Sun by JG Ballard. From that point onwards there was no going back on this discovery as I moved on to The Kindness of Women and then discovered his dystopian or more accurately Ballardian novels turned a locked door in me.

My intrigue with the built environment and society within that was something I felt was best kept private, as it was quite a weird thing to be interested in – or so I thought. As it turns out, much of the fiction that JG Ballard penned struck at the very core of what I sometimes caught only a glimpse of in my travels, but in which he burrowed out a mine full of veritable detail and semblance of vision and structure.

For me, Ballard was not a science fiction writer, but rather an observer, an astutely aware person of the interaction between humankind, technology and our environment. Prophetic he may not be in the strictest sense, but he always struck at the core of something somewhat uneasy and unspoken in society.

I know I will greatly miss his work, and I for one am indebted for his contribution he has made on my literary journey, and those others who cite him as influential that too have gone on to be great writers themselves.

My only wish is that he was well enough in February last year to see him at the Southbank Centre, alas his illness prevented him from being able to host the evening. But he did write, and in those words we found inspiration so deeply inseparable from a man with such vision and understanding.

Thank you.

JG Ballard – 1930-2009

Arguably this happened before digital came along as some of the 35mm compact cameras from the ‘80s and ‘90s were pretty boring things to look at. A lump of plastic with some cheap chrome effect trims and buttons. Nothing to write home about.

Now I’ll be the first to admit that I tend to use things that get the job done above and beyond aesthetics and so forth so owning a Leica isn’t a fashion statement for me, it’s the tool that gets the job done. The fact that I still own, drive and run a pants car (a 1988 Ford Escort no less – and it looks a right heap) is a testament to the fact I couldn’t give a flying f*ck about keeping up with the Jones’ or indeed embark on a major binge of short term consumerist highs. I like nice things, I respect people who have nice things, but I’m no fashion victim myself.

In yet another conversation where I was told (no not asked, told) why I should dump my film gear I explained all the usual stuff – I like working with the aesthetic film gives, I like projecting my slides to family and friends, I enjoy developing and experimenting with processing my films and I adore working in the darkroom making prints. Then I thought of another reason.

It doesn’t apply across the board as this criticism applies to my EOS 3 and in fact most modern film SLRs too – but I increasingly don’t like the look, the feel and the actual usability of modern cameras. I like things to be simple. These days, EOS 3 included (so this isn’t an anti-digital rant, I don’t do those as they are futile) there are buttons and gizmos everywhere, it’s hard to use a camera sometimes without taking your eye off the ball. This applies less to SLRs as the viewfinder usually gives you all you need to know and a good one with good ergonomics will allow you to adjust the exposure, meter etc. all from your shooting grasp. Digital compacts less so.

 
Workmen (Leica M2, Summar f/2, Fuji Neopan 1600, Kodak Xtol 5mins 21C)

I hate all that clutter, it distracts you. A good camera can equally be one with all the buttons and menu options in the world, but also be one with a shutter speed dial, a shutter release and a rewind knob. Sure the latter is pretty basic (but also aptly describes the Leica M2!) but there’s little where you can go wrong or fumble.

The problem I have is that technologically you can’t fault the cameras. I might think that sounds a bit pap with regard to things like smile detection but if they help people who aren’t photographically adept take good photos then that’s a great thing. What I don’t like is the fact that there are heaps and heaps of options and buttons on many cameras now which really make the thing too complicated. It would be nice to also see a bit of older styling here and there. I prefer the way cameras were made to they way they are now made, although those barely 1” thick  digital compacts are pretty neat looking things.

Maybe Olympus’ Micro 4/3rds (Panasonic Lumix G1) for example will be a starting point for making cameras a bit smaller again and a little less cluttered?

There is of course the Epson (Cosina) RD1/s/x and Leica M8 but we’re not talking about a £150-200 compact camera there, we’re talking a lot of money, especially on the M8.2 at getting on for £4000 which is very questionable.

So that was my other reason, I like the feel and usability of older cameras more than the newer ones. Smile detection is great, but it isn’t necessary in the hands of someone who at least protests to know what they are doing!

Apparently on the 2nd of March 2009, my lickle blog was rated by WordPress 84th for Growing Blogs.

I’m not sure what that means but it sounds good. Maybe some one does read my inane drivel hehe.

March 2nd 2009 : growing blogs

Oskar Barnack, the man behind the original Leica camera designed the system to use 35mm movie film because of his asthma. A smaller lighter camera gave him the opportunity to walk and take photos which erstwhile equipment prevented due to its large size — 35mm was and is a miniature format. Yet today super-zooms and cameras including my own EOS 3 whilst undoubtedly robust, it is a big camera and does not make for long journeys on foot in my book. I have done it and for me I found the camera was not getting used because of its weight at the end of the day. You can read more about that in a previous blog post.

Having bought the M2, the plan was not so much to replace the EOS 3 but to have a smaller, lighter camera to use on occassion on walks. The reverse has happened, the M2 is fast becoming the only camera I use. From walks to pub gatherings and taking the odd silly snap down a night club, the M2 has become a a fantastic camera.
Read the rest of this entry »